User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » How many spaceship are exploding other planets? Page [1]  
HockeyRoman
All American
11811 Posts
user info
edit post

7/10/2013 6:30:56 PM

Jaybee1200
Suspended
56200 Posts
user info
edit post

thats no spaceship, thats a moon

7/10/2013 6:48:15 PM

y0willy0
All American
7863 Posts
user info
edit post

oh man, jaybee.

you make it too easy dude.

7/10/2013 6:49:04 PM

Jaybee1200
Suspended
56200 Posts
user info
edit post

or maybe it is you that makes it too easy for me...

7/10/2013 6:50:29 PM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

if Alderon had a moon, do you think it ceased orbit, or if the bulk of the debris was inside it's orbit path and the planet's mass still had a locus at the orbit path of it's own former center of gravity, that the moon just kept on keeping on?

omg now i'm actually curious.

CALL THE Wraith (played by Harvey Keitel)

[Edited on July 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM. Reason : adfsadf]

7/10/2013 7:36:20 PM

PaulISdead
All American
8708 Posts
user info
edit post

7/10/2013 7:42:18 PM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

7/10/2013 7:47:31 PM

Smath74
All American
93277 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"if Alderon had a moon, do you think it ceased orbit, or if the bulk of the debris was inside it's orbit path and the planet's mass still had a locus at the orbit path of it's own former center of gravity, that the moon just kept on keeping on?"

i guess it depends... did Alderon explode with enough force that the majority of it's mass dispersed into space (most of the mass reaching escape velocity), or did most of the mass NOT reach escape velocity, and eventually clump back together to form Alderon Mark II? In the former case i would imagine the moon too would escape. In the former, i'm sure it's orbit would be affected but it would very likely remain in the system.

7/10/2013 7:48:35 PM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

Yeah.. but lets say... the entirety of the planet's mass remained inside the moon's orbit path, but in granular sized bits and magically evenly distributed in a disk like shape, flush with the plane on which the moon's orbital ellipse lies, would such a moon's orbit change even in the slightest?

And for that matter, would the shape of the debris make a difference?

So long as the gravity was calculated at a single point, if the former planet took on an improbable shape of a thin line of matter extending along the axis of it's former rotation (assuming the moon's orbit averaged along the planet's equator) thus perpendicular to and at the center of the plane of the moon's orbit, would the same hold true?

7/10/2013 8:10:02 PM

Førte
All American
23525 Posts
user info
edit post

it became the moon that smashed chewie

7/10/2013 8:13:12 PM

Smath74
All American
93277 Posts
user info
edit post

an uneven distribution would have an effect on the orbit... for example you would think that something in orbit around our moon would have no problems at all staying in orbit with there being no atmospheric drag and whatnot, but the gravitational variations within the moon (which is in fact still intact) are enough to disturb the orbit of objects enough so much they can eventually crash into the moon. (apollo 15 and 16 released probes at roughly the same orbit, but the one from 16 had an unstable orbit and eventually crashed)

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=1972-031D

[Edited on July 10, 2013 at 8:36 PM. Reason : ]

7/10/2013 8:36:45 PM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

remember my question is a hypothetical. Let's assume the particle disk and line are static in shape and density and very much evenly distibuted. The question is really are these bodies shapes generating a gravity footprint (in relation to the moon) inconsistent with that of a solid sphere

[Edited on July 10, 2013 at 8:49 PM. Reason : d]

7/10/2013 8:47:17 PM

Smath74
All American
93277 Posts
user info
edit post

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem

7/10/2013 8:52:46 PM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah that deals with spherical bodies... I guess I need to reframe my question.
I hate not knowing enough about something to even ask the right fucking question

but as punishment for linking me to a wikipedia article, read and attempt to reconstruct the wikipedia page on Lagrange Points L2, L4 and L5.

That shit is magic and you know it

7/10/2013 8:58:33 PM

Smath74
All American
93277 Posts
user info
edit post

well, without doing the maths, i would assume that if the material was evenly distributed then yes it would act as a single point.

but if those particles got close enough to the moon, the moon's gravity would probably have a disruptive effect on the particles and screw the whole thing up.

7/10/2013 9:02:32 PM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

fair enough

7/11/2013 1:19:40 AM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148210 Posts
user info
edit post

its Alderaan you fucking nerds

7/11/2013 1:29:49 AM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

The one that got blown up in real life in the movie? Yeah.

Smath and I are talking about a fictitious planet with a name intentionally similar to it as an homage.

7/11/2013 1:43:52 AM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » How many spaceship are exploding other planets? Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.