http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIH2vM91bFE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhIBWnUHrfw


HAHAHAHAHAHA

8/31/2013 11:53:14 PM

bike thieves... modern day horse thieves?

8/31/2013 11:54:30 PM

and after watching that video... i hope those fuckers are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. that beatdown was completely unnecessary, illegal, and irresponsible.

a group of fucking gym rats with weapons attacking one person who almost stole a bike.

[Edited on August 31, 2013 at 11:56 PM. Reason : ]

8/31/2013 11:55:48 PM

That looked like it was in China or something, so the law probably doesn't give a crap.

9/1/2013 12:00:15 AM

^^ I thought the exact same thing but its still funny hahahaha

[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 12:00 AM. Reason : /]

9/1/2013 12:00:34 AM

hang them

9/1/2013 12:00:54 AM

CHARLIE MURPHY WHAT I'M GONE GONE DO BOUT MY LEGS?!?!?!?!?

[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 12:02 AM. Reason : /]

9/1/2013 12:02:11 AM

http://youtu.be/OC5VCs5i5CE?t=6m17s

9/1/2013 12:05:21 AM

Quote :

" a group of fucking gym rats with weapons attacking one person who almost stole a bike. "

So when is there an acceptable level of "compassion" for someone who does something morally wrong? The thief was trying to steal something. Does it matter if it was a bicycle? What if it was $10, or a priceless keychain? What if it was someones life? Murdering someone is no different from taking/stealing their life.

People are *generally* punished on the damage they cause rather than the action(s) they took. We as humans are distracted by the damage/effect that we lose sight of the real sin/fault. The man tried to steal. Why does it matter the apparent worth of the object being stolen? Why aren't actions punished instead of the damage (or potential damage) caused by the actions?

A thief is a thief is a thief. I don't care if they steal $5 from a wallet or a brand new Porsche 991 Turbo. They stole. They are guilty of that. They should be punished accordingly. Society has no room for degenerates that disturb an otherwise peaceful society. Yet, we allow it. When society takes it upon themselves to punish wrong and evil deeds, you chastize them? Who's side are you on? If that's the case, then would-be criminals who's attempts are foiled should go unpunished. Is that truely your resolve?

You shouldn't draw the line by placing value or assessing the damage or possible damage. The action is or is not. It is absolute, as should be the punishment. By tollerating evil, you allow its filth to spread.

That is all.



[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 6:23 AM. Reason : .]

9/1/2013 6:11:16 AM

Your point is understandable but relatively moot; you can't punish every crime or amoral act with the same severity. Its just not within the scope of our 'social contract' here in America. Should he have gotten his ass whooped? Hmmm, I dunno, and with that said if you commit such acts you open a myriad of punishments that could or could not be appropiate, legally or morally. Basically, if you steal and get your ass whoop it should be expected.

9/1/2013 7:42:22 AM

Quote :

" The action is or is not. It is absolute, as should be the punishment."

So if I reach inside a vending machine and steal a bag of chips, you think I should be punished as severely as as a con-man who defrauds an old couple out of their life savings?

For me, evil = hurting people. The more your crime hurts people (in full knowledge that it's going to hurt them) the more evil it is. And the more severely you deserve to be punished. For me this is self-evident.

9/1/2013 7:49:45 AM

Quote :

"So when is there an acceptable level of "compassion" for someone who does something morally wrong? The thief was trying to steal something. Does it matter if it was a bicycle? What if it was $10, or a priceless keychain? What if it was someones life? Murdering someone is no different from taking/stealing their life. People are *generally* punished on the damage they cause rather than the action(s) they took. We as humans are distracted by the damage/effect that we lose sight of the real sin/fault. The man tried to steal. Why does it matter the apparent worth of the object being stolen? Why aren't actions punished instead of the damage (or potential damage) caused by the actions? A thief is a thief is a thief. I don't care if they steal $5 from a wallet or a brand new Porsche 991 Turbo. They stole. They are guilty of that. They should be punished accordingly. Society has no room for degenerates that disturb an otherwise peaceful society. Yet, we allow it. When society takes it upon themselves to punish wrong and evil deeds, you chastize them? Who's side are you on? If that's the case, then would-be criminals who's attempts are foiled should go unpunished. Is that truely your resolve? You shouldn't draw the line by placing value or assessing the damage or possible damage. The action is or is not. It is absolute, as should be the punishment. By tollerating evil, you allow its filth to spread. That is all."

wtf

and here in america we have a justice system. it's not perfect, but a 5 on 1 beatdown with WEAPONS (i mean really, what kind of chicken shit enters a 5 on 1 fight with a weapon?) is beyond any sort of "social justice"

I don't even have a problem with someone trying to stop harm to themselves or their property on their own, but once that act is prevented, any further steps (such as an assault in this case) is retaliation and not prevention. Nobody appointed that mob judge/jury.

9/1/2013 8:13:54 AM

yeah, i usually agree with hiro but that's crap

9/1/2013 8:36:41 AM

maybe that asshat will learn the lesson to not steal shit.

9/1/2013 9:35:40 AM

people who gang-assault people are "worse" than someone who steals some petty shit.

9/1/2013 10:13:38 AM

maybe the extra beating is from their adrenaline pump haha

PS-they don't look like they go to the gym at all

9/1/2013 10:35:03 AM

theyre asian, if you weigh more than 80 pounds soaking wet, you're buff there

9/1/2013 10:39:15 AM

lol

9/1/2013 10:44:19 AM

9/1/2013 10:47:35 AM

Quote :

"wtf and here in america we have a justice system. it's not perfect, but a 5 on 1 beatdown with WEAPONS (i mean really, what kind of chicken shit enters a 5 on 1 fight with a weapon?) is beyond any sort of "social justice" I don't even have a problem with someone trying to stop harm to themselves or their property on their own, but once that act is prevented, any further steps (such as an assault in this case) is retaliation and not prevention. Nobody appointed that mob judge/jury."

I think this thief got exactly what he deserved. They should of beat him with the bike. I'll assume anyone that defends thieves have never had something valuable stolen from them. I've had my house broken into and a car stolen, if I had caught either of the thieves I would have happily shot them and faced the consequences.

Here comes the argument that a life is more important than personal property....GO

[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 11:56 AM. Reason : ..]

9/1/2013 11:55:12 AM

Suite yourself - sacrifice your life for someone who most likely has nothing at all to lose. Way to go!

9/1/2013 11:57:35 AM

Quote :

"Stand your ground"

9/1/2013 12:20:57 PM

he caught a 30-second beatdown for trying to steal their shit, and then they let him go

what the fuck is the problem?

Pussification of America China

9/1/2013 12:50:10 PM

nobody here is saying the thief was in the right. I didn't know it was in china so i guess things are different there with different rights and justice systems and things. (like getting executed for being in porn and kim jung II jr's ex-girlfriend)

but over here in the civilized worled innocent until proven guilty is here for a reason. mobs roaming the streets instilling "justice" would cause udder chaos.

9/1/2013 1:36:15 PM

Quote :

"CAUSE UDDER CHAOS"

9/1/2013 1:39:00 PM

^^Innocent until proven guilty? The fucker had the bike in his hands when they stopped him. The only thing wrong with that video is that they didn't beat the kid hard enough to teach him never to steal again or make him incapable of riding.

9/1/2013 1:57:23 PM

lots of tuff talk.

not sure what law gives a mob the right to vigilante justice with no trial.

[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM. Reason : ]

9/1/2013 2:00:10 PM

lots of bitch talk in here too.

9/1/2013 2:18:13 PM

it's amazing how fast you people would just wipe your ass with the constitution.

^SO TUFF.

[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 2:19 PM. Reason : ]

9/1/2013 2:18:43 PM

we have a human right to the defense of life, liberty, and property - protected by the constitution.

9/1/2013 2:45:18 PM

i agree, but physical force should have only been used to stop him from stealing the bike. not for retribution or punishment. (which was the case in this video)

9/1/2013 2:57:17 PM

Quote :

"we have a human right to the defense of life, liberty, and property - protected by the constitution."

If you keep reading, there's also something in there about cruel and unusual punishments--a phrase that implies punishments should be commensurate with the crime and damage done.

9/1/2013 3:23:47 PM

What punishment does she deserve?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LF0IhyAasWw

9/1/2013 4:04:28 PM

If he is not punished how will he learn to never steal again? Do you know what happens to thieves in our criminal system? Slap on the wrist and they are back out again. Its bullshit.

9/1/2013 4:08:10 PM

You fat meatbag

9/1/2013 4:09:25 PM

I'm convinced. All thieves and Chicken McNugget addicts shall henceforth be curb stomped.

9/1/2013 4:09:27 PM

lol that chicken nugget lady was on meth and probably have been up for days without food

9/1/2013 4:16:00 PM

eating chicken mcnuggets was punishment enough

9/1/2013 4:28:19 PM

Just don't make her assume her ultimate form!

9/1/2013 4:32:16 PM

what did she use to break that window?

9/1/2013 5:26:42 PM

I am thinking about heading out to go bike riding, so will the thunder storms get me or should i just wait until tomorrow?

9/1/2013 5:52:47 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi6XtthI2F0

9/1/2013 8:58:57 PM

Had he been legally carrying a gun could he have shot one of then and been on?

9/1/2013 9:07:53 PM

One of the YouTube comments says that the nuggets video is real but that it as received a voice-over.

Either way, her punishment is obvious: she should be force fed 5 pounds of nuggets. That should teach her!

9/1/2013 9:13:51 PM

^^^ Isn't is illegal to shoot someone with a paintball gun?

[Edited on September 1, 2013 at 10:30 PM. Reason : .]

9/1/2013 10:30:16 PM

1) it's Asia, bikes are WAY more important to people's livelihoods over there, so the excessive beat down was worth it, to them. It's like taking someone's car.

2) it's Asia, their police are less honorable and rule-bound as ours, it makes sense street justice was doled out. Street justice is very effective, but it only takes 1 psycho taking things too far before no one is allowed to beat anyone up and you HAVE to call the cops.

9/1/2013 11:54:31 PM

Quote :

"I think this thief got exactly what he deserved. They should of beat him with the bike. I'll assume anyone that defends thieves have never had something valuable stolen from them. I've had my house broken into and a car stolen, if I had caught either of the thieves I would have happily shot them and faced the consequences."

I've had two bikes stolen (in college), my house broken into and multiple electronics stolen, my parent's house broken into and multiple guns stolen, my car broken into and my stereo stolen... and i think this was excessive. sure, i wish i could have caught the people who stole my items, and i wouldn't mind seeing them get a light beating, but a 5 on 1 total beatdown with a chance of permanent damage with weapons is excessive. if they'd caught him and got in a few good licks and held him for the cops, i'd think it was awesome, but they went too far. it's a fucking bike.

people applauding the excessive beating of a guy for stealing a bike aren't any better than a petty thief. don't fool yourself into thinking you're not a shitty person.

9/2/2013 11:01:17 AM

Quote :

"but a 5 on 1 total beatdown with a chance of permanent damage with weapons is excessive. if they'd caught him and got in a few good licks and held him for the cops, i'd think it was awesome, but they went too far. it's a fucking bike. people applauding the excessive beating of a guy for stealing a bike aren't any better than a petty thief. don't fool yourself into thinking you're not a shitty person. "

The thief instigated by trying to steal a bike. It's not like he was left laying there crippled. He got his ass whooped, probably pretty bad too. But at the end of it, he could still move around. What if it was just 2 on 1. Or 1 on 1? Does the numbers really matter? Should the thief be allowed to escape punishment for breaking the law?

how do you rationalize a person defending their property (or someone elses for that matter) being similar to a thief?

Quote :

"I've had two bikes stolen (in college), "

I've had one bike stolen in college. I looked for a year on craigslist and local shops for my beloved bike. If I caught the person who stole mine, I would have tackled them and whooped their ass on the spot. That person is still out there. Possibly even stole more bikes. If they do it once, they're not going to stop. They'll do it again, and again... Society shouldn't make room for scum who steal. I don't know why people sympathize with leeches.

[Edited on September 2, 2013 at 7:55 PM. Reason : .]

9/2/2013 7:54:05 PM

just a FYI, the line between 5 guys piled on top of 1 guy, subduing him.....and 5 guys piled on top of 1 guy causing him to suffocate is razor thin.

Not saying the group was piled on top of him or anything. Just drawing attention to the fact that 5 on 1 can turn deadly quickfast. The force applied multiplies fast, without the knowledge of of the individuals involved.



http://rt.com/usa/man-death-police-disabled-534/

[Edited on September 2, 2013 at 8:03 PM. Reason : Ggttyyhuij]

9/2/2013 8:01:52 PM

Do they even lift bro?

Bet he won't steal anything for a while

Fuck him, good for those guys for beating the shit out of him.

9/2/2013 8:18:22 PM