http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/889543128/equal-means-equalDid you know that women are not guaranteed equal rights under the constitution? I didn't know that, and I find it to be quite shocking. Shouldn't that, umm, come well before equality and rights for gays? The last time (1982) the US voted on the ERA (Equal Rights Amendment), it didn't pass. Obviously, many people don't want women to have equal rights, and don't mind pay and job discrimination against women.From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment:
10/19/2013 3:16:05 AM
10/19/2013 2:31:56 PM
I just posted this on teh faceb00kz
10/19/2013 4:09:04 PM
Thanks, good to know there are still some good people in the world, even if a dwindling minority.
10/19/2013 4:37:14 PM
So, because we didn't vote for a stupid and meaningless amendment to the Constitution, it means we hate women and want them to be discriminated against...]
10/20/2013 1:01:55 AM
I wonder how these people would feel about men having an equal say in the life of their unborn child...
10/20/2013 1:14:31 PM
Or if a man is drunk and a women has sex with him she could be charged with rape...Equality is great until it isn't
10/20/2013 1:21:46 PM
^, ^^ Yes I agree with those. If equality is to be instituted, it should go both ways.^^^ Well a lot of people do, and you can't deny that, including lots of conservative politicians. And I don't see why you would call it a meaningless and stupid amendment.
10/20/2013 4:39:35 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/1oud93/as_a_formerly_homeless_male_who_got_treated_like/
10/20/2013 5:18:11 PM
[Edited on October 20, 2013 at 5:18 PM. Reason : whoops]
Just $3795 left to go for the stretch goal in 8 hours.
10/20/2013 6:11:23 PM
^ Yeah I am keeping an eye on it and hope they succeed... even fantasizing about making up whatever difference there is a couple of minutes before it closes
10/20/2013 6:14:34 PM
a lot of people also think that the institution of the ERA would lead to unisex bathrooms and inclusion of women in the draftI don't have a problem with either of those
10/20/2013 7:01:44 PM
let me rephrase. picking and choosing when men and women are treated equally because of a "biological difference" completely undermines the entire basis for the equality argument. [Edited on October 20, 2013 at 8:46 PM. Reason : ]
10/20/2013 8:37:37 PM
The law ought not ameliorate the hardships caused by biologically based differences among people; this is why we don't have universal basic health insurance for the elderly or disabled and we expect children to go to work to support themselves.wait that was 100 years ago
10/20/2013 10:14:30 PM
10/21/2013 11:06:55 AM
God damn it. As much as I despise most feminist agendas when this point gets brought up I want to join them.Abortion is a bodily autonomy issue and your involvement in the implantation of an embryo in her body has zero bearing on it. The suggestion that a man should have equal say in whether a woman should have a medical procedure is completely insane.However, giving men the option to opt out of the responsibility would be nice and a step toward equality here but you just are never going to reach parity when the issue involves the rights of a person to their own body. And fixing the justice system's massive bias against men while you're at it.[Edited on October 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM. Reason : .]
10/21/2013 11:40:46 AM
The medical procedure most directly affects the fetus, not the mother. A father should have just as much say in the outcome of his child's medical well being as the mom.
10/21/2013 11:54:51 AM
No, he shouldn'tbecause if his say got equal play, then if he wanted the kid and she didn't, it means she's a babymaking slave for 9 months
10/21/2013 12:06:30 PM
^"only equal until it's inconvenient for women"
10/21/2013 12:07:44 PM
Because going through an unwanted pregnancy and birth is "inconvenient."
10/21/2013 12:09:53 PM
it's also convenient that either decision a man makes doesn't inconvenience him for 9 months
10/21/2013 12:10:19 PM
It could inconvenience him for 18 years
10/21/2013 12:14:25 PM
She already agreed to that point.
10/21/2013 12:28:59 PM
10/21/2013 12:32:01 PM
Yes, thanks anti-abortion propaganda!
10/21/2013 12:37:44 PM
10/21/2013 1:12:42 PM
smath is paid by the government to spend time alone with your children
10/21/2013 2:04:44 PM
(i guess it's good that I don't like people killing them, huh?)
10/21/2013 2:21:43 PM
like there aren't any abused kids in your school that nobody can deal with and are destined for a shitty life, stemming from the fact that their parents didn't want them. I'm all for people making better choices before, during, and yes, even after sex to avoid creating miserable lives for children who didn't deserve it. do you believe convicted rapists should be able to sue mothers of rape babies for visitation rights? our sweet government allows that and it's horrible. I find it equally repugnant that some men think women they impregnate should be forced to carry an embryo because these fine gents are interested in the outcome of their sperm donation. It's already simple to prevent your sperm becoming abortion fuel, and that's to wear a condom and pull out or abstain from sex until both parties agree that a conception is what they both want.
10/21/2013 2:38:56 PM
10/21/2013 3:55:26 PM
this is goodhttp://www.policymic.com/articles/68993/this-shocking-ad-campaign-uses-google-to-show-the-absurd-sexists-problems-women-face
10/22/2013 11:45:19 AM
good except that like a lot of those types of lists, it has garbage filler to try to make an agenda look better
10/22/2013 12:29:11 PM
10/22/2013 12:53:05 PM
10/22/2013 1:18:07 PM
^ i meant that it's an example of a factor that could make a difference in pay, and that's all. believe it or not, this is actually a possible scenario.another example would be that a company values a male worker more than a female; in this example, sexism exists.does that make you feel better?^^
10/22/2013 2:39:31 PM
no, because you're admitting that sexism could be a part of that statistic (as I'm sure it is)but moreover, that you think it's okay[Edited on October 22, 2013 at 2:42 PM. Reason : because it is ridiculous that a woman wouldn't get paid the same for the same work]
10/22/2013 2:41:17 PM
10/22/2013 2:42:50 PM
10/22/2013 4:26:20 PM
10/22/2013 4:56:48 PM
you can't think of a situation where a man wouldn't want a woman who got pregnant with his child to abort it?
10/22/2013 5:14:48 PM
10/22/2013 5:25:39 PM
10/22/2013 5:33:56 PM
Why would anyone believe something that is morally sound not also be legally enforced? If they think that is the way it should be, why wouldn't they want the law to reflect it? I assume smath would be comfortable with the law forcing women to respect the father's wish (and he's not the first person I've encountered, try the men rights reddit sometime)
10/22/2013 5:49:05 PM
aww man it didn't reach the stretch goal
10/22/2013 7:06:02 PM
10/22/2013 7:34:24 PM
10/22/2013 8:05:03 PM
It's as equal as it can reasonably get. You're not jonesing for an equal chance of dying or getting infected during childbirth. You're not arguing for an equal amount of back pain, incontinence, nausea for 10 months or hemorrhoids and general recovery for months after. The biological truth of childbirth in our species demands "unequal" rights in this case. Start this conversation when the technology allows men to become pregnant and birth babies becomes readily available.
10/22/2013 8:20:31 PM
10/22/2013 11:27:35 PM
10/23/2013 8:25:24 AM