User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » So...who is, or is considering, voting for Trump? Page 1 ... 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 ... 40, Prev Next  
dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

not everyone who disagrees with me is a fucking retard or idiot

anyone who voted for trump is objectively a stupid fucking moron

1/31/2017 11:54:26 AM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

that just proves my point

enjoy the next 4 years, sport

1/31/2017 11:55:55 AM

JCE2011
Suspended
5608 Posts
user info
edit post

Next 8 years if the leftists don't change their tone

1/31/2017 11:57:52 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

^^so you are not terrified by how trump is acting?

[Edited on January 31, 2017 at 11:59 AM. Reason : .]

1/31/2017 11:59:02 AM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm waiting for his next post, its gonna go

RAWR RAWR RAWR RAWR, the last word, RAWR RAWR RAWR

1/31/2017 11:59:25 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

so you are not terrified by how trump is acting?

1/31/2017 12:01:54 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

why should I be?

1/31/2017 12:09:46 PM

dmspack
oh we back
25175 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"^no its not, that's the other extreme"


right, but you can't present the other extreme as a legitimate option when that extreme was never on the table. you're saying that trump's immigration policy is one end of the spectrum and that it's better than the extreme opposite end of the spectrum. but that extreme (which you said was let everybody come, give em all amnesty, and give em all welfare) was never on the table. it was never a one or the other scenario. there already was a middle ground.

[Edited on January 31, 2017 at 12:13 PM. Reason : i'm just confused by what you're calling a "middle ground"]

1/31/2017 12:12:50 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

no the other end would be concentration camps and/or genocide, and those guys are in Syria

but I cant use that argument, because you said so

1/31/2017 12:16:38 PM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"why should I be?"

the leader of our nation and head of state gets into twitter arguments over crowd sizes, that's not concerning?

1/31/2017 12:27:31 PM

SSS
All American
3645 Posts
user info
edit post

If he doesn't get it, explaining it is not going to help. This is the typical Trump voter.

1/31/2017 12:32:56 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"gets into twitter arguments"


he did that before the election, and still won

did you really expect different?

1/31/2017 12:36:28 PM

JCE2011
Suspended
5608 Posts
user info
edit post

We have another narcissistic POTUS arguing with hostile media? Yea, why should anyone care?

My question is why don't any of you care about the millions of braindead SJW Marxist protesting non-existent "oppression" and demanding socialist redistribution of wealth to make up for their poor decisions? Oh wait, that's yall

1/31/2017 12:36:54 PM

packboozie
All American
17452 Posts
user info
edit post

Yeah what Obama did to the press is identical to what this 12-year old does

1/31/2017 12:38:03 PM

dmspack
oh we back
25175 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"no the other end would be concentration camps and/or genocide, and those guys are in Syria

but I cant use that argument, because you said so"


ok sure. we can just move right past defining the specific extremes on each side, that's really not even necessary. my point is...you said this about Trump's plan:

Quote :
"but its better than letting them all in and giving them welfare and amnesty, while legit immigrants are still waiting

"


that was never an option. why compare Trump's policy to something that was never an option? you're clearly implying that prior to Trump we were just letting in all illegal immigrants and giving them amnesty. which was not the case.

1/31/2017 12:42:27 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

no, they are expecting serious answers in chit chat

where often threads can get derailed by random pictures

1/31/2017 12:42:35 PM

EMCE
balls deep
89694 Posts
user info
edit post

Chit chat or not, he has a point that you seem to be ignoring.

1/31/2017 12:46:16 PM

0EPII1
All American
42526 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"that was never an option. why compare Trump's policy to something that was never an option? you're clearly implying that prior to Trump we were just letting in all illegal immigrants and giving them amnesty. which was not the case."


So Stinger, you don't have an answer to the above, right? You admit you were just presenting one of the extremes as a red herring?

1/31/2017 12:46:39 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

no, I will present this as a red herring:

1/31/2017 12:48:00 PM

0EPII1
All American
42526 Posts
user info
edit post

Thanks for confirming that you were distracting us with fallaciously implying that one of the extremes was being followed before he came to power.

1/31/2017 12:50:45 PM

JCE2011
Suspended
5608 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Yeah what Obama did to the press is identical to what this 12-year old does"


Notice I said hostile press, meaning only FOX news. The rest of the media was in love with him.

Obama's whitehouse said Fox was "not a news network".

It's almost as if politicians don't like media that is in bed with their political opposition...

You can bet if Obama's whitehouse caught Fox News giving Mitt Romney debate questions in advance, or a Fox reporter submitting his articles to the GOP for approval first, or Fox coaching a viewing panel on what pro-GOP shit to say, etc... he would fight back accordingly.

[Edited on January 31, 2017 at 1:01 PM. Reason : .]

1/31/2017 12:57:28 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

I don't imply anything, I'm posting dumb shit in the correct section



WHY SO SERIOUS?

1/31/2017 1:01:16 PM

dmspack
oh we back
25175 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" I'm posting dumb shit"


as long as we agree on that

1/31/2017 1:23:39 PM

EMCE
balls deep
89694 Posts
user info
edit post

About Donna Brazil giving Clinton a debate question....


Am I the only one that thinks that was blown a bit out of proportion? I mean, Brazil told Clinton prior to the debate that 'a woman with a rash will ask you what you will do about the water crisis in Flint, Michigan?'. Given that the debate was held in Michigan, while this whole debacle about Flint's water was in full swing, WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIGHT COULD NOT HAVE ANTICIPATED A QUESTION LIKE THAT FROM THE CROWD?

I'm not saying Brazil was right in giving a question to Clinton. I'm saying the advance question was of limited help.

1/31/2017 1:25:19 PM

NCSUStinger
Duh, Winning
62329 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"hang out, socialize, and just generally screw around!"


10-4 good buddy



notice it doesn't say

Quote :
"politics, social issues, financials. basically anything serious."

1/31/2017 1:25:30 PM

eleusis
All American
24527 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Why is this such a hot button issue now that had to be acted upon?"


because it offered a quick and easy way to see how fast the machine worked and which parts needed to be replaced for when the real immigration battle with Mexico takes place.

The temporary ban on 7 countries identified by the Obama administration is dominating the news cycle, even though the majority of Americans that supported trump don't care one way or the other. Meanwhile, Section 7 the executive order calls for the expedited completion of biometrics tracking on ALL non-citizen entry and exit; this goes above and beyond the previous scope of NSEERS. No one seems to be complaining about the language laying the groundwork for a massive deportation tool that now seems inclusive of Central America.

Section 10 of the executive order reads like it was written by someone who believes the US government has been lying to us about the number of terror plots and suspects that have been uncovered domestically in recent years. The first required reporting will be in 180 days, so we'll see what shows up.

1/31/2017 1:57:03 PM

NeuseRvrRat
hello Mr. NSA!
35376 Posts
user info
edit post

i like the facebook posts showing the twin towers on fire and defending the EO. a terror plot executed by dudes from saudi arabia (a fact that our government tried very hard to hide from us), a country that's not even on the list.

1/31/2017 7:09:28 PM

Cherokee
All American
8264 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIGHT COULD NOT HAVE ANTICIPATED A QUESTION LIKE THAT FROM THE CROWD"


I tend to agree with you but if it was easily anticipated why did someone specifically go up to Clinton and give it to her?

It was clearly an attempt to help her.

FYI I voted for Hillary, I'm not Trump trolling you.

1/31/2017 7:24:06 PM

EMCE
balls deep
89694 Posts
user info
edit post

It perhaps was an attempt to help her. The point I was trying to make was that the help was of limited usefulness... so limited in fact, that the comment to Clinton might as well have been about the woman's rash If the comment was of that limited usefulness, I'd argue that the whole OMG CLINTON GOT A DEBATE QURSTION AHEAD OF TIME argument is simply blown out of proportion.

1/31/2017 7:41:20 PM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

no one else wants to claim their vote?

understandable.

feel shamed.

2/1/2017 1:46:59 PM

Str8BacardiL
************
41737 Posts
user info
edit post

First weekend shows complete incompetence.

The weird guy that is his brain is a disturbing character.

2/1/2017 2:33:40 PM

titans78
All American
4030 Posts
user info
edit post

One thing with this EO that makes it even more frightening is that to supporters it looks necessary no matter what. If in 180 days there are no terror attacks people defending and agreeing will just say, "see it worked! We are so safe!" If we do happen to get attacked during that time, it will just push forward the agenda that we need even more restrictions because we are just that vulnerable, even though it would probably be a US Citizen or someone in the country that a ban wouldn't have stopped. Either way, there isn't a result that would make the supporters go, "oh yeah that was dumb."

Meanwhile far more fatass people die each day from the fact that they can't quit drinking 128oz sodas yet nobody seems to want to ban the drinking of mountain dew. So how important really is our safety then? Irrational Fear is a great way to control people(and money). As a side note I love the people that live on some farm in the middle of nowhere Ohio afraid of terrorist. The irony of our nations most likely terrorist targets generally being areas that are all blue.

2/1/2017 2:39:54 PM

JCE2011
Suspended
5608 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"OMG CLINTON GOT A DEBATE QURSTION AHEAD OF TIME argument is simply blown out of proportion."


It wasn't just the question about Flint.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39807

These are only the ones sent to Podesta through dnc email that we would be able to see. What is troubling isn't the usefulness of the questions, but the fact that Donna Brazile is still the chair of the DNC, and she has made it clear she has no regrets about leaking the questions... as well as the willingness of the DNC hacks to not care about this, or blame Russia.

2/1/2017 2:46:55 PM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

okay, so you made the bigly mistake of thinking that trump was less corrupt than clinton, that's understandable

but now that you've seen him in office do you see what kind of a cock-up you've made?

2/1/2017 2:48:44 PM

JCE2011
Suspended
5608 Posts
user info
edit post

No way, he is doing way better than I could have imagined. This SCOTUS pick alone was worth it.

The best part is, everything he does triggers the hacks and SJWs. This will be a great 4 years.

2/1/2017 3:55:12 PM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

i didn't read the username in the last reply

computer, disregard!

2/1/2017 3:56:49 PM

JCE2011
Suspended
5608 Posts
user info
edit post

You actually thought someone besides me in this echo-chamber didn't vote for crooked Hillary? Yea right

2/1/2017 4:42:22 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

JCE owes everything to his white privilege...

TRIGGERED!!!

2/1/2017 5:50:54 PM

Jrb599
All American
8845 Posts
user info
edit post

I see moron's name is appropriately fitting.

2/1/2017 6:20:54 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

Sweet burn

2/1/2017 6:32:16 PM

moron
All American
33716 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ does that mean I should be president?

2/1/2017 6:33:24 PM

kdogg(c)
All American
3494 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^^^^^

8 years

2/1/2017 10:13:11 PM

beatsunc
All American
10650 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"not everyone who disagrees with me is a fucking retard or idiot

anyone who voted for trump is objectively a stupid fucking moron"


this attitude is a big factor why hillary lost. when you are trying to convince someone to come around to your way of thinking starting by insulting them is not very effective

2/1/2017 11:11:51 PM

synapse
play so hard
60908 Posts
user info
edit post

Yah I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure Hillary lost because she was a terrible fucking candidate, not because of some rando message board poster's opinion.

2/1/2017 11:56:20 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ trump won bc abunch of people with fragile egos had their feelings hurt?

They were so triggered by being called morons they voted Trump?

2/2/2017 6:51:18 AM

Doss2k
All American
18474 Posts
user info
edit post

Clinton lost because they were both horrible candidates but way too many people assumed Hillary had it in the bag because thats what the media kept telling them. So a lot of people didnt show up to vote for her thinking oh she is already gonna cream Trump no need to bother going out. That combined with the amount of closet (insert deplorable adjective here) who voted for Trump but still probably wont admit it in public to this day is why Trump won.

2/2/2017 8:11:11 AM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

If there's one actual commonality amongst all these terrorist/mass shooting losers, it's that they're all men, and from what I can tell, they're all men who don't get laid enough.

So I say we encourage immigration while still maintaining a heavy ban on unattractive men.

The extreme vetting process will just be a panel of me having sex with all potential male immigrants. If I don't feel too gross after the sex, then they can stay. To be clear, gay immigrants will not be exempted from sleeping with me.

2/2/2017 8:37:38 AM

justinh524
Sprots Talk Mod
27194 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" they're all men, and from what I can tell, they're all men who don't get laid enough."


Welp, I guess I'm gonna be a terrorist.

Also is this extreme vetting limited to immigrants???

2/2/2017 9:10:00 AM

Doss2k
All American
18474 Posts
user info
edit post

San Bernadino victims disagree with you

2/2/2017 10:00:02 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

that was carried out by a US citizen and someone from a country not banned

2/2/2017 10:05:23 AM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » So...who is, or is considering, voting for Trump? Page 1 ... 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 ... 40, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.