User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » President Biden credibility watch Page 1 ... 24 25 26 27 [28], Prev  
bbehe
2019 Egg Champ
17642 Posts
user info
edit post

Without finding the clip, let me guess, it was a question from Doocy?

1/14/2022 2:26:10 PM

The Coz
Tempus Fugitive
18956 Posts
user info
edit post

More like Douchey, amirite?!

1/14/2022 2:27:05 PM

0EPII1
All American
42226 Posts
user info
edit post

Her answer was both relevant and irrelevant.

Reporter: A, B, and C are bad
Spokesw: X, Y, and Z are good
Reporter: So all is good and no change is needed?
Spokesw: Bunnies and ice cream

WTF?

If she had explained how A, B, and C are being discussed or improved, there wouldn't have been a need for him to follow up her answer with his comment.

1/14/2022 2:41:09 PM

bbehe
2019 Egg Champ
17642 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Q Thank you. I have a couple specific ones, but I wanted to kind of follow on that. As you’re determining next steps — I mean, frankly, things just seem like they’re going pretty poorly right now for the White House. You know, Build Back Better is being blocked. Voting rights is being blocked. Diplomatic talks with Russia doesn’t seem to have brought us back from the brink of war. Inflation is at a 40-year high. The virus is setting records for infection.

So, as we kind of hit this one-year period, and a period where everything seems like it’s in pretty rough shape, or nearly everything — which is not an invitation, I guess, to list off some other things — I’m wondering, at what point do you take stock and say that things need to change internally, whether it’s your outreach with the Hill, whether it’s the leadership within the White House. You seem to be stymied on an incredible number of fronts right now.

MS. PSAKI: Well, let me give you a little bit of a different take on this. More than 200 million people are vaccinated. We’ve had record job growth, record low unemployment rates — historically, in this country, over the last year. We’ve rebuilt our alliances and our relationships around the world. And right now, as it relates to Russia, as you heard our National Security Advisor convey, we’re working with partners around the world to convey very clearly: It’s up to them to make a choice about what’s next. We’re not going to make that on their behalf. It’s up to them to determine if there are going to be crippling economic sanctions or not, or — if they decide to move forward.

But we also recognize when you have a small margin and threshold in the Senate, it’s very difficult to get things done and to get legislation passed. And the fact that the President, under his leadership, got the American Rescue Plan passed, a Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill with 19 [Republican] votes in the Senate, about 6 [Republican] votes in the House. The fact that we are still continuing to work with members to determine the path forward on Build Back Better; that we have the vast majority of Democrats in the Senate supporting voting rights. That’s a path forward for us.

And our effort is to do hard things, try hard things, and keep at it. So, we just don’t see it through the same prism.

Q So, the sense is things are going well; there’s no need for change right now?

MS. PSAKI: I think that having worked in a White House before, you do hard things in White Houses. You have every challenge at your feet — laid at your feet, whether it’s global or domestically.

And we could certainly propose legislation to see if people support bunny rabbits and ice cream, but that wouldn’t be very rewarding to the American people.

"


So to summarize, the reporter brought up
Build Back Better being blocked
Voing Rights being blocked
Russia
Inflation
Virus

Psaki in turn responded with
Build Back Better - "The fact that we are still continuing to work with members to determine the path forward on Build Back Better"

Voting Rights - "that we have the vast majority of Democrats in the Senate supporting voting rights. That’s a path forward for us. "

Russia - We’ve rebuilt our alliances and our relationships around the world. And right now, as it relates to Russia, as you heard our National Security Advisor convey, we’re working with partners around the world to convey very clearly: It’s up to them to make a choice about what’s next. We’re not going to make that on their behalf.

Inflation - Didn't address, but really what power does the President have for this?

Virus - more than 200 million people are vaccinated.

I don't see why you folks are insulted by this.

1/14/2022 2:53:33 PM

A Tanzarian
drip drip boom
10626 Posts
user info
edit post

It's #walkaway fodder.

1/14/2022 3:34:17 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52194 Posts
user info
edit post

Gonna give him negative points for using scare tactics to nuke the filibuster. If there ever was something that the filibuster was meant for, it would be one party to ram through a federal takeover of elections procedures on a partisan 51-50 vote. The crap about Trump is barely even addressed by either of the two proposed bills, and it's the far graver threat than cutting back early voting by a couple weeks or nuking dropboxes.

The reality is, state elections laws are largely more liberal today than they were 15-20 years ago. Dems weren't bitching about how "suppressive" they were then. And what most states are rolling back to is still more liberal than 15-20 years ago. The two bills represent little more than liberal wet dreams of how they'd like all states to run their elections (similar to the failed BBB and "childcare is infrastructure BS they tried to ram through), it'd be unConstitutional to try and mandate it though Congress anyway, and wrapping it up as "voting rights legislation" is about as disingenuous as it gets. It's up there with "THE DEMS ARE GUNNA TAKE YER GUNS!!!!!!" as far as bullshit fearmongering.

And acting like republicans have been the only ones abusing the current filibuster is a farce. The republicans were douches about it during Obama's term, sure, but Dems were awful about it under Bush as well, using in ways that up to that time were quite unprecedented. It's reeks of sour grapes. If you want to reform it, make the assholes actually stand up and talk, instead of making a phone call. But then, *neither of you* would be able to abuse it the way you have been for the past 20 years.
What DOESN'T make sense is handing a gift to Mitch McConnell, who has royally fucked Dems in the ass with every single rules change they have tried to get around his antics. He's already promised to throw all the lube out of DC once the Republicans take back control of the Senate, so why in the hell would you give him that. Come up with shit people actually support, and the Reps won't be able to block it. Or, make partisan wish lists and be shocked that they fail. Let's be clear: the first two years of the Trump admin would have been radically and dangerously different had Cheeto not had to contend with a filibuster. Don't give turtle-boy and whatever fascist POS comes next out of the GOP that power.

1/14/2022 9:20:24 PM

StTexan
All American
2345 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" Come up with shit people actually support"


I find this post eye opening in that “this is how non right wing nuts think”

And i agree with focus on things majority of folks give a fuck about. I happen to think this is one of those issues

Only prob is 50% agree, and other 50% are you, or not sure

1/15/2022 12:27:51 AM

The Coz
Tempus Fugitive
18956 Posts
user info
edit post

Valid points, but what gives confidence that the increasingly radicalized Republicans themselves won't change the rules when they take back power? They've already done it with judicial nominees, and that's certainly been working out great.

1/15/2022 7:25:40 AM

rwoody
Save TWW
32310 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"It's up there with "THE DEMS ARE GUNNA TAKE YER GUNS!!!!!!" as far as bullshit fearmongering."


Almost no Dems have they're going to take your guns. Almost every republican has tried to steal at least one election.

1/16/2022 1:12:54 AM

thegoodlife3
All American
36936 Posts
user info
edit post

and are more than willing to steal each and every election they’re able to

1/16/2022 1:37:55 AM

moron
All American
32859 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" Come up with shit people actually support, and the Reps won't be able to block it."


This is patently untrue. They will block anything and everything. They blocked Obama’s right wing Supreme Court pick. They supported stimulus under trump but not now (not that Biden is pushing for it). They would rather see people suffer as long as they perceive it hurts democratic politicians. Gop treats politics as warfare where it’s a matter of survival (for the white race), democrats treat it as a game of croquet.

You’re right though they’re blowing up their voting rights as fighting a grave threat but the bill has very marginal changes. Unless they’re looking at universal registration and setting standards that dictate a maximum waiting time to vote, it’s not a really serious bill.

1/16/2022 2:43:06 PM

bbehe
2019 Egg Champ
17642 Posts
user info
edit post

Universal Background checks regularly polls at what? 95%? Republicans shoot it down CONSTANTLY

1/16/2022 4:34:35 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52194 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ And yet, we got some semblance of an infrastructure bill through. There's no doubt that the Reps are being intransigent little shitheads just because they can. But if you bring in things that are actually needed, in ways that are agreeable to more than just the extremes in the Dems, they have less chance to block it, because the few folks left in swing states will pay the price.

It seems like it's just the Reps blocking legislation, but I'd counter that it's more an artifact of them not having any cognizable platform over the last 30 years beyond "fuck the Clintons." That kind of environment doesn't lend itself to bringing much legislation that could be blocked by Dems. The only thing I can think of in recent memory was their attempt to repeal Obamacare, which was blocked by, wait for it, the filibuster forcing things to go through reconciliation where the Pubs couldn't get everything they wanted and devolving into infighting. Put frankly, there hasn't been much for dems to block. Except judicial nominees, which they've been just as douchey about as the Pubs.

Meanwhile, we've got the President shamelessly accusing Republicans of implementing "Jim Crow on steroids." Jim fucking Crow. You know, where blacks were beaten and lynched for registering to vote. Or they faced poll taxes and reading tests (while not being taught to read). And what is this "steroidal" environment? 6 weeks of early voting instead of 8, asking people to get a god damned stamp to mail in a ballot as opposed to universal dropboxes, expecting folks to give enough of a shit to register sometime before the day of the election they want to vote in, or expecting them to *gasp* know where their fucking voting precinct is. Jim Crow on steroids? Get the fuck out of here with that shit.

1/17/2022 7:19:17 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52194 Posts
user info
edit post

None of that is to say that there aren't very concerning things happening. There very much are, but the Dems ain't doing jack shit about it. There's been no effort whatsoever to try and reform the Electoral College Act after Reps tried to game it. That's inexcusable. There has been no movement to protect the US Postal Service from the blatant political interference Trump attempted to prevent absentee ballots and applications from being mailed. I'd even be game to mandate certain staffing levels of voting precincts based on the number of people being served to avoid the 12 hour lines we saw in Georgia after officials drastically cut the number of precincts in urban areas. Outside of elections, Dems have done nothing to protect Voice of America from more Trump-like political interference, which is equally inexcusable.

What the fuck are they actually doing? We saw the blueprint the next would-be fascist takeover will follow, and Dems are fucking around with their pet projects like the whole god damned country isn't on fire, while Trump moves to put loyalists in key positions across the country to try again. It honestly feels like the only one preparing the country for the next assault on our institutions is Cheeto, himself

[Edited on January 17, 2022 at 8:12 PM. Reason : ]

1/17/2022 8:09:59 PM

moron
All American
32859 Posts
user info
edit post

I think the geriatrics in charge of the democrats mostly agree with the geriatrics in charge of the republicans is the problem

Aoc and the squad and Bernie need to find a way to take over if we want to see real progress in the country

1/17/2022 11:48:00 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » President Biden credibility watch Page 1 ... 24 25 26 27 [28], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2022 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.