User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
 School Tool » »
Name of Instructor : M Bourham
Average user rating : 3.13
Average GPA of classes taught : 3.16
Std. dev. of classes taught : 0.29
Percentile within all instructors : 60%
Percentile within dept. instructors : 100%
 Spring 2010
Class Instructor Days Time Books Users
NE 408 section 001 Bourham M 430PM-530PM 0 0
NE 408 section 003 Bourham M 430PM-530PM 0 0
NE 408 section 004 Bourham M 430PM-530PM 0 0
NE 408 section 005 Bourham M 430PM-530PM 0 0
NE 491 section 002 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 591 section 003 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 693 section 002 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 795 section 005 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham ARRANGED 0 0
 Spring 2006
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 403 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 403 section 002 Bourham % 1
NE 403 section 003 Bourham % 1
NE 403 section 004 Bourham, Yim % 1
NE 693 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 732 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 740 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 745 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 795X section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Fall 2005
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 201 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 491 section 001 Bourham % 1
NE 528 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 693 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 893 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Spring 2005
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 403 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 693 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 732 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 740 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Fall 2004
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 201 section 001 Bourham % 1
NE 491 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 528 section 001 Bourham % 1
NE 693 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 780 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 893 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Sum II 2004
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 491 section 001 Bourham % 0
 Sum I 2004
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 491 section 001 Bourham % 0
 Spring 2004
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 403 section 001 Bourham % 1
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 732 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 740 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Fall 2003
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 201 section 001 Bourham 2.95 1.33 50% 7
NE 528 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 491 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 528 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Spring 2003
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 403 section 001 Bourham % 1
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 732 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Fall 2002
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 201 section 001 Bourham 3.36 0.64 100% 6
NE 528 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 591 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Spring 2002
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 403 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 732 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 740 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 Fall 2001
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
NE 201 section 001 Bourham % 2
NE 528 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 528 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 591E section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 695 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 699 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 780 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 780 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 795 section 001 Bourham % 0
NE 895 section 002 Bourham % 0
NE 899 section 002 Bourham % 0
 User Ratings
zerus
All American
2575 Posts
user info
course :NE 201
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :Pretty easy class that's mostly for non majors who just want to learn a little bit about nuclear engineering. Not very in depth at all
class :Fall 2001 section 001
grade received :B+
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Yeah I know it was an easy A, I turned in my papers late just about every time. I'm just a slacker
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :He hands out a lot of photocopied notes instead of lecturing from memory, some people like this, but I don't. I'd rather have to take notes since it makes me remember what I'm hearing instead of just picking up a packet a few days later
nonlogic
All American
1252 Posts
user info
course :NE 201
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :Not hard, but too much information to cover for a 2 credit class.
class :Fall 2001 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :The class was nothing exceptional.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Great guy. Very willing to help in any way possible.
wolfnuke
All American
875 Posts
user info
course :NE 201
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :Pretty basic material. Does give you an idea if you really want to do NE.
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :B-
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Just had to write a few papers and projects. Attendance was not mandatory, but he will know if you don't show up and it reflects in him giving extra points when needed.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :Great teacher, but his assignments were a little too vague, never told us what he wanted and graded harshly if we didn't figure it out.
kdawg(c)
Suspended
10008 Posts
user info
course :NE 403
course rating :0 - Horrible
course comments :Assessment: Had we been given the HELIOS code much earlier in the semester (week 5 rather than week 14), the little problems we had would have been resolved quickly with no adverse effects on the final project. However, because it took so much to give HELIOS to us and because MINIMIAL support was given by our advisors, these little bumps became very large and our project was severely limited.
class :Spring 2003 section 001
grade received :N/A
class rating :0 - Horrible
class comments :As I am not one who likes complaining while presenting no solutions, I would highly recommend that the Dean of the College of Engineering (and possibly the Vice Chancellors for Student and Academic Affairs) investigate the climate for learning in the Department of Nuclear Engineering and consider hiring faculty and staff who develop a strong desire for students to learn.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :This would entail interviewing students from all classes (freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors) as well as all teaching faculty in the department.
lecatpuke
Veteran
170 Posts
user info
course :NE 201
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :Nice and easy intro to nuclear engineering.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A-
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :You just go over the text in class, but it's not bad because it's small. The grading confused me, though.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Nicest guy, always willing to explain things. His accent doesn't count against him because it tends to lighten up the class from time to time.
sherae915
Veteran
184 Posts
user info
course :NE 201
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :Only because it lets you know if you want to be a NE or not. Most of the people in my class were pretty excited about the stuff, me, not so much. Easy material, just read it and go over it. A couple papers, one lab (a joke), an ideal amount of material in that it covered most all the concentrations of NE, from medical to motors.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :Pretty boring, but like I said, alot of people in class were into it. A good amount of work every other week or so when something was due or there was a test. No attendance policy but being one of the only girls, he noticed everytime I missed.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :Good if you are a NE major, not so otherwise. I switched to ChE in the middle of the semester and it was like night and day. Helpful outside of class, highly encouraged you to visit his office (if you can catch him there). Email responses fast.
lecatpuke
Veteran
170 Posts
user info
course :NE 491
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :This was the 1 CR Senior Design prep. Good concept.
class :Fall 2005 section 001
grade received :N/A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :Several presentations and group meetings. Good for staying on task, but some of it was useless.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :He does a decent job of choreographing things even if it seems chaotic at times.
lecatpuke
Veteran
170 Posts
user info
course :NE 403
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :Senior design, semester 2. Expect presentations at least every other week. Two faculty presentations, two IAC presentations, and the UG Symposium.
class :Spring 2006 section 003
grade received :N/A
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Depending on your advisor, and if you can stay on top of the project, it's not bad. Take all criticism from the faculty seriously, since they're going to be providing a portion of your grade.
instructor :Bourham
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :Does a good job as leader for all the projects. I'd suggest getting in good with him, since he contributes the 2nd most to the grade.

© 2019 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.37 - our disclaimer.