Quote :

"Amazing how CNN drops it from their front page entirely once they realize it doesn't fit the narrative they were hoping for."

Top left under TOP STORIES = "drops it from their front page entirely" eh?

11/2/2016 11:58:25 AM

Quote :

"Perhaps the guy didn't put up a fight?"

there are plenty of dead black guys who were killed by cops who "didn't put up a fight"

11/2/2016 12:02:09 PM

yeah, but all those people had demon eyes, so its not the same

11/2/2016 12:09:39 PM

Quote :

"Perhaps the guy didn't put up a fight?"

right, so you're more willing to entertain the thought that all of these unarmed minorities not only resisted the police, but did so in such a way as to make the cops believe their lives were peril (that's the legal justification for police using lethal force). Despite overwhelming evidence in some cases, that no such justification existed.

11/2/2016 12:23:33 PM

It could also be that the cops want to make an example out of the man? I don't know. But normally, cops don't take it easy on cop-killers.

I'm really surprised the guy is still breathing. Maybe it all had to do with the Trump sign. You know since Trump supports cops, and he supports Trump, they let this guy off without killing him.

11/2/2016 1:12:55 PM

or maybe, when it comes to minorities, the police generally don't feel compelled to attempt to keep suspects alive.

11/2/2016 1:17:48 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/us/mississippi-black-church-vandalized-vote-trump/index.html

My money here is on BLM.

Trump supporters can be dumb, but not this dumb. This seems like an obvious act of anti-Trump terrorism.

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 1:20 PM. Reason : s]

11/2/2016 1:20:02 PM

^they're dumber than that. they're supporting trump.

11/2/2016 1:22:14 PM

...because in the heart of Mississippi, it is the BLM protestors that have a rich history of burning black churches.... Especially to score political points.

Yep, I can see why your bet would be on BLM here.

11/2/2016 1:24:13 PM

You know, come to think of it, it was probably BLM that shot up that memorial sign for Emmet Till too

11/2/2016 1:26:50 PM

90% certain that is a DNC contractor's actions

Quote :

"right, so you're more willing to entertain the thought that all of these unarmed minorities not only resisted the police…"

Is this not factually accurate in the overwhelming majority of the cases? Resisting arrest is the common theme… that isn’t a “thought to entertain” it is reality.

Quote :

"but did so in such a way as to make the cops believe their lives were peril (that's the legal justification for police using lethal force). "

Guess what? If you want to scare the shit out of a cop, being black isn’t the way to do it: Resisting arrest is.

But by all means, keep spreading the narrative that melanin has more influence than actions when it comes to cop interactions. Anything to replace personal responsibility with victimhood. That mindset is just what young black males need!

Quote :

"Despite overwhelming evidence in some cases, that no such justification existed."

“In some cases”? Perhaps in the vast minority of cases there is *some* evidence that there was no justification for lethal force, and in those cases there is a justice system that will handle it.

I know you SJWs want to paint with the broadest of brushes for your fragile victim narrative, but the reality is that resisting arrest gets you shot, not being black. Though as we have seen the riots, facts don’t matter to the brain-dead SJW ilk. You tell them they are a victim, they will believe it. Then they will steal some TVs for social justice.

11/2/2016 1:39:13 PM

Quote :

"90% certain that is a DNC contractor's actions"

LOL. While you've apparently convinced yourself you're unbiased and that you use logic to form your opinions, you've made it abundantly clear that you are extremely biased, and that drives most of your judgements and opinions, and once you've formed those opinions, nothing will convince you otherwise and anyone who thinks otherwise is a "liberal" or "SJW", or whatever buzzword you're using at the time. You immediately believe and latch onto anything that supports your narrative, and quickly dismiss anything that doesn't support your biased opinions. You're no better than the crazy SJWs or Hilary hacks, you are a joke.

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM. Reason : ]

11/2/2016 1:46:55 PM

why do you keep responding to him in earnest?

11/2/2016 2:06:19 PM

We've seen the DNC so desperate to paint the "evil racist violent Trump" narrative that they payed, trained, and planted people to start fights at rallies.

You hacks would never had believed that claim until the Scott Foval comments.

The fact that actual Trump voters would know this would only hurt the great pumpkin, combined with the timing, and recent DNC slime... 90% likelihood that this is DNC contractor.

11/2/2016 2:11:23 PM

^^^we've already gone over the Anti-SJW SJW thing many moons ago. It's well known that it has become the very thing it despises.

in before the "if this were a Hillary supporter, the libs wouldn't say a word about it"

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM. Reason : ]

11/2/2016 2:15:01 PM

For most of the race hoaxes we have seen, they've been by amateur BLM "activists" on college campuses looking for an excuse to be a victim. I doubt a DNC-backed operation would leave much evidence. Seriously though "vote Trump" is just too obvious. A racist that burns a church isn't about supporting a candidate, they are about hating the group they attack. I know the media and leftists are soooooo desperate to connect Trump (or anyone that disagrees with them) to racism, but something like this is such a blatant false flag, especially with the timing.

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM. Reason : .]

11/2/2016 2:29:30 PM

A white guy allegedly killing two cops, and a black church being burned and vandalized has turned into finger pointing at BLM protestors.

O______o

11/2/2016 2:32:02 PM

tinfoil hat alert!

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM. Reason : those darn blacks, making white people kill cops...]

11/2/2016 2:33:35 PM

Why would a supporter of a politician do an action to sabotage that politician?

I wouldn't expect gullible SJWs to understand, all of you fell for the Mizzou race hoax, the clock boy Islamaphobia hoax, etc. something as obvious as "vote Trump" probably wouldn't draw any scrutiny from such gullible worshippers in the church of victimology.

90% DNC sub sub sub contractor. Think Scott Foval's instigators, but even more desperate/secretive.

11/2/2016 2:38:09 PM

ahaha, Herb's brain has spun all the way up into mode

11/2/2016 2:38:10 PM

^^cuz he dumb?

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM. Reason : Vote Trump! (awww crap...now you know I work for the DNC)]

11/2/2016 2:40:42 PM

All I'm saying is, we have seen plenty of cases of:

-"Protestors" desperate to be victims
-DNC employees desperate to sell narratives

And we have seen some corrupt, deceitful, dishonest lying to accomplish the above.

And in every case you SJWs believe it without giving it any thought. Because the HuffPo is happy to tell you the narrative, but hesitant to correct it once the facts are learned.

I'm betting 10% actual racist Trump supporter, 90% DNC false flag.

11/2/2016 2:55:58 PM

11/2/2016 3:08:19 PM

Quote :

"^ are you incel or volcel?"

He's quite clearly incel.

11/2/2016 3:12:19 PM

11/2/2016 3:18:44 PM

Would any hacks be willing to even entertain the idea that the DNC would be willing to do something like this? Just curious.

I know you would have the same response to the claim that the DNC planted trained instigators at Trump rallies. But then that inconvenient Scott Foval video...

You don't have to admit it was likely, just that given the timing and recent shit they've done, It's something to consider

11/2/2016 3:42:20 PM

I mean its possible I guess but it definitely seems more likely that it was just a racist asshole who supports Trump

11/2/2016 3:45:27 PM

^^ it's possible.

Only a hack who was triggered would claim it was a 90% chance with no evidence

11/2/2016 3:58:36 PM

I am voting 3rd party because fuck these two. Don't care if Gary Johnson was an empty roll of toilet paper I'd still vote for him. Having said that, it's obvious Hillary is losing the African American vote, and a very low percent early voted. The election is in a few days. A black church is burned with vote Trump spray painted on it. Hillary Campaign has played the racist narrative the entire time. It's not far fetched at all IMO

11/2/2016 4:06:49 PM

I dont get why a Trump supporter would put Vote Trump on a church and then burn it down.

Is it really more likely that they would scare people into voting for Trump vs scaring people away?

11/2/2016 4:10:35 PM

Quote :

"Only a hack who was triggered would claim it was a 90% chance with no evidence "

11/2/2016 4:12:22 PM

Quote :

"I dont get why a Trump supporter would put Vote Trump on a church and then burn it down."

Yeah, like that is going to garner a ton of votes. Just doesn't make sense

11/2/2016 4:12:38 PM

Yeah, I'm sure people who do this are rational actors with solid thought processes.

11/2/2016 4:15:23 PM

Or are they..........

11/2/2016 4:17:33 PM

Quote :

"A black church is burned with vote Trump spray painted on it. Hillary Campaign has played the racist narrative the entire time. It's not far fetched at all IMO "

I thought the same. Asides from spray painting "I, Donald Trump am vandalizing this black church because I hate black people" there isn't much else they could have done to more clearly try and fabricate another "Trump is racist" headline.

If an actual racist that burns a black church is a member of the KKK, they don't spraypaint "support the KKK" on it. They spray paint hate. Not who to support politically.

11/2/2016 5:04:29 PM

Quote :

"ould any hacks be willing to even entertain the idea that the DNC would be willing to do something like this? Just curious. "

I think I've made it clear that I could believe that a Hilary supporter might do something like this, just like I believe that there might be instances of DNC operatives inciting violence at some Trump rallies. But I'm not willing to jump to conclusions with no evidence. As others have mentioned, it's hilarious that you automatically assume that it has to be the DNC, and are willing to put made-up statistics to this assertion (just like you did for something else, I can't even recall what that was now). Just because it fits your narrative. And you call others hacks. Ha!

11/2/2016 5:10:58 PM

"Might" be instances of DNC inciting violence? It was proven. And that's just what they got caught admitting to on tape.

Saying it "might have happened" in the face of proof just displays your bias. That's why you're a hack.

My "statistics" were just my guess as to the likelihood of cause, I never claimed anything else.

11/2/2016 5:36:41 PM

Some operative possibly getting people to get rowdy before a campaign event causing it to get shut down is not remotely in the same league as Trump telling his crowd multiple times to hit protestors (and, shocker, having them actually do it), calling supporters who beat an immigrant "spirited", having a guy at the convention call for Clinton to face a firing squad, or any other number of times Trump or his surrogates have called for or referenced using violence.

It's just further delusion to suggest Clinton and Trump are equals here, when Trump is way worse.

11/2/2016 5:47:12 PM

I think Ronald Reagan was involved in the plot to kill JFK.

11/2/2016 6:25:29 PM

Quote :

"Some operative possibly getting people to get rowdy before a campaign event causing it to get shut down is not remotely in the same league as Trump telling his crowd multiple times to hit protestors (and, shocker, having them actually do it), calling supporters who beat an immigrant "spirited", having a guy at the convention call for Clinton to face a firing squad, or any other number of times Trump or his surrogates have called for or referenced using violence."

It isn't just the Chicago rally with the DNC's paid protestors. It's all of those events you just referenced, you insufferable hack. People at Trump rallies are punching people because the DNC organized, trained, and planted people to go and INSTIGATE violence .

You claim Trump is worse and then you reference the violence the DNC secretly plotted and organized.

H-A-C-K

11/2/2016 6:38:38 PM

Quote :

"Why would a supporter of a politician do an action to sabotage that politician? "

If every Trump supporter who says or does something stupid that makes Trump look bad is really a DNC plant, then Trump doesn't actually have many supporters.

[Edited on November 2, 2016 at 7:36 PM. Reason : Donald J. Trump is actually a DNC plant to make Trump look bad!]

11/2/2016 7:35:30 PM

^^you keep conveniently leaving out that those trained, Paid instigators also coordinated with Brietbart writers to get "Rubiobot" on video protesting Rubio rallies. You know, back during the primaries when your boy Trump was targeting little Marco with every trick he knows.

11/2/2016 8:06:18 PM

Lol at the false flag Hillary conspiracy for the church burning

It's a million times more likely that it was dumbass teenagers

11/2/2016 8:16:46 PM

JCE has a new word

11/2/2016 10:15:12 PM

Quote :

"^^you keep conveniently leaving out that those trained, Paid instigators also coordinated with Brietbart writers to get "Rubiobot" on video protesting Rubio rallies. You know, back during the primaries when your boy Trump was targeting little Marco with every trick he knows."

Im not defending the credibility of Breitbart. I'm shitting on the corrupt DNC.

11/2/2016 11:17:07 PM

Quote :

"Having said that, it's obvious Hillary is losing the African American vote"

so that's a thing that somebody posted

11/3/2016 2:47:44 AM

I'm going to assume JCE plans to write in Reagan or something similarly stupid

11/3/2016 7:06:08 AM

Finally, NYT confirms it was a white guy for us:

Quote :

"The suspect in the "ambush" killings of 2 Iowa police officers was described as a troubled loner"

11/3/2016 8:44:12 AM

I'm almost positive that Greene's shooting of two cops will be thrown into a statistic of murdered police officers in 2016, which will then be used as justification for more heavy-handed policing of black communities.

11/3/2016 8:52:07 AM

Indeed... troubled loner does = old white guy haha

11/3/2016 8:52:21 AM