Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
not at all. You'd have to be a retard to use firefox over ie6. Opera? Sure. fine. whatever. But firefox is a bloated piece of shit.
And mouse gestures are fucking worthless.
hmmm yase, i will move my mouse around like an idiot instead of clicking the button my thumb is resting on. 9/2/2008 3:40:26 PM |
nothing22 All American 21537 Posts user info edit post |
it makes me feel like a wizard 9/2/2008 3:41:29 PM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
the interface is too cartoony for me 9/2/2008 3:42:07 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "i got these lame side-buttonless mice here at work
i rely on avant's "hold one button down and click the other" style for internets
button the gesturing is a little ~" |
Mouse gestures are one of those features that can be really nice if you're stuck with a shitty mouse, but not really a deal breaker if you've got a 4 or 5 button mouse.
Quote : | "yay 98% of the css works fine
FUCK YOU 2% " |
Much like Safari, it completely chokes on using firstChild.data in JavaScript. Goddamn it.
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM. Reason : .]9/2/2008 3:42:10 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
Works in IE, good enough for me. 9/2/2008 3:44:29 PM |
nothing22 All American 21537 Posts user info edit post |
ye
my problem with gesturing is my own ineptness at wizardry
i try to conjure a page back but end up summoning a new tab 9/2/2008 3:44:46 PM |
tsavla All American 6787 Posts user info edit post |
downloading now 9/2/2008 3:45:10 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "i try to conjure a page back but end up summoning a new tab" |
Pro-tip: If you right click and tap your mouse down slightly to the lower right, then left click it takes you back a page.
It's like a gesture, it just doesn't require any special software!9/2/2008 3:46:24 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
^ IE6 mouse gestures. woot 9/2/2008 3:47:14 PM |
tsavla All American 6787 Posts user info edit post |
awesomE 9/2/2008 3:49:20 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "You'd have to be a retard to use firefox over ie6." |
i'm going to go ahead and disagree with you...i can't imagine what IE6 has going for it that isn't blown the fuck away by FF3
Quote : | "Oh, I get it you're trolling.
Carry on then." |
ah, just saw this...for a minute there, i thought he was serious
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 3:52 PM. Reason : .]9/2/2008 3:51:24 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
Blown away by the ammount of ram firefox is leaking. 9/2/2008 3:52:41 PM |
Remnazuo Veteran 117 Posts user info edit post |
Chrome makes facebook and digg seamless. The javascript upgrades really are as awesome as they're advertising.
So far, it seems to actually use less memory then firefox.
Only problem - phpMyAdmin does not work, which means I'll still need to use firefox for work tasks. Also, my plugins don't work either, but I expected that to happen. 9/2/2008 3:53:17 PM |
El Nachó special helper 16370 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "hmmm yase, i will move my mouse around like an idiot instead of clicking the button my thumb is resting on." |
What's wrong with flicking your wrist up to go to the top of the page? or down to go to the bottom. or being able to use the scroll wheel to change tabs?
It's not like I have a gesture to go to official website of the Louvre every time I draw a rough sketch of the Mona Lisa. Hell the most complicated gesture I make is an L which takes me to the next page and a reverse L (down and to the left) to take me to the previous page.
But if you don't like them, that's fine. No one is forcing you to use them. But I refuse to believe that they're garbage if they increase my productivity and enhance my browsing experience.
And actually on topic...
I already see some weirdness with the javascript used in the quote buttons on TWW. It puts the quote tag after the cursor.9/2/2008 3:53:19 PM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
srsly 9/2/2008 3:53:37 PM |
dFshadow All American 9507 Posts user info edit post |
chrome doesn't work for me oh well 9/2/2008 3:54:00 PM |
Smoker4 All American 5364 Posts user info edit post |
Sounds like a more-or-less tactical move from Google. As I understand it, they end up paying Mozilla a lot of money (like $70 mil/year) just for royalties from Google toolbar click-throughs. So it's a no-brainer to launch their own browser -- all other things being equal, they cut into FireFox's royalties. Big businesses with scale go vertical to improve their margins -- no surprises here.
Of course there's the "going up against Microsoft" angle. I don't put too much stock in it ... maybe there's a wild off-chance that Microsoft could see this as a lever to make themselves seem less monopolistic. Like on Windows FuglyVista2012 you get a "Google or Microsoft browser" choice when you install. After all, the Browser Wars are sooooo 1997 -- today it's all about pwning search! Otherwise IE enjoys the same advantages it always has, and likely always will.
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 3:57 PM. Reason : foo] 9/2/2008 3:56:39 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "i'm going to go ahead and disagree with you...i can't imagine what IE6 has going for it that isn't blown the fuck away by FF3" |
As I've explained many times on TWW, everything works in IE6.9/2/2008 3:57:15 PM |
LickHer All American 1580 Posts user info edit post |
The task manager is pretty cool with the nerd stats
right click the top blue portion>task manager>nerd stats 9/2/2008 3:58:21 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "As I've explained many times on TWW, everything works in IE6." |
except good CSS?9/2/2008 3:58:23 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
"Good CSS" is an developer issue, not a visitor issue. While everyone gets bent out of shape over the developer aspect of a browser, the visitor aspect is far, far more important.
And still to this day, people don't make sites that don't work in IE6.
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 4:00 PM. Reason : .] 9/2/2008 3:59:41 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
There is no such thing as good web standards. No one implements them the same. Every browser renders shit differently. So until a real organization comes up with a real set of standards everyone follows to the letter, the market leader should dictate the standard. 9/2/2008 4:00:27 PM |
El Nachó special helper 16370 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the market leader should dictate the standard." |
Oh jesus christ, if you're not trolling you should really just quit now.9/2/2008 4:01:44 PM |
LickHer All American 1580 Posts user info edit post |
Are you guys talking about ie's failure with acid3? 9/2/2008 4:02:03 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | ""Good CSS" is an developer issue, not a visitor issue. While everyone gets bent out of shape over the developer aspect of a browser, the visitor aspect is far, far more important.
And still to this day, people don't make sites that don't work in IE6." |
cool...so a shitty browser isn't actually shitty as long as back-end folks work twice as hard with twice the code necessary for every other browser?
thankfully, when IE8 comes out, i don't have to code for shitastic IE6 anymore...i only have to code for the current and most recent past version of each browser
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 4:03 PM. Reason : .]9/2/2008 4:02:12 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Oh jesus christ, if you're not trolling you should really just quit now." |
He's making a more than valid argument.
Quote : | "cool...so a shitty browser isn't actually shitty as long as back-end folks work twice as hard with twice the code necessary for every other browser?" |
Shitty or not, developers make sure that everything works for it, which is why it's arguably the most important browser for visitors to have.
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 4:04 PM. Reason : .]9/2/2008 4:03:36 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
IE8 is gonna be terrible because they've put in a ton of shit from other browsers.
imo the standard style webbrowser with javascript hacks for ajax should disapear in favor of real language based clients such as silverlight. 9/2/2008 4:06:20 PM |
LickHer All American 1580 Posts user info edit post |
oh well. that doesn't matter now.
http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisedesktop/archives/2008/09/ie_8_consumes_m.html
[Edited on September 2, 2008 at 4:08 PM. Reason : :/] 9/2/2008 4:07:08 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "And still to this day, people don't make sites that don't work in IE6. " |
Except for facebook.9/2/2008 4:09:11 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Except for facebook." |
Facebook works fine in IE6, unless you're talking about how Facebook Chat is handled in an external window, which honestly, I prefer to the IE7/Firefox version.9/2/2008 4:10:46 PM |
LickHer All American 1580 Posts user info edit post |
YES!!! Noen vs Stein. The epic battle has begun. 9/2/2008 4:12:12 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
9/2/2008 4:13:49 PM |
OmarBadu zidik 25071 Posts user info edit post |
using it - undecided yet but first look isn't bad
http://celtickane.com/webdesign/jsspeed2007.php why does it run slower in this test than firefox? ]] 9/2/2008 4:17:59 PM |
BigMan157 no u 103354 Posts user info edit post |
nerd stats doesn't play well with multipleIE 9/2/2008 4:29:34 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
^^ what happens if you run it multiple times? Does it speed up after the first time? 9/2/2008 4:36:28 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
^^^ IE supremacy 9/2/2008 4:37:30 PM |
philihp All American 8349 Posts user info edit post |
In IE and Netscape, when I middle-click white-space I get an "up-down" circle thing, and i can move the mouse up and down to scroll. In the google browser, when I middle-click white-space, nothing happens.
Is this just my machine, or is this function intentionally missing? 9/2/2008 4:53:10 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Missing.
And while I don't have Safari installed, IIRC, it's missing in Safari for Windows as well. 9/2/2008 5:09:00 PM |
EuroTitToss All American 4790 Posts user info edit post |
google has a fucking sense of humor:
9/2/2008 5:10:42 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
dont mean to go off topic, but is ff3 worth downloading? the upgrade thing keeps coming up and i push later cause my internet is slow and i dont feel like closing my tabs 9/2/2008 5:22:59 PM |
DirtyMonkey All American 4269 Posts user info edit post |
yes get it now 9/2/2008 5:38:46 PM |
LunaK LOSER :( 23634 Posts user info edit post |
i'm a fan....
and it's pretty too 9/2/2008 5:55:23 PM |
wilso All American 14657 Posts user info edit post |
this is pretty awesome 9/2/2008 6:00:09 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
I was listening to Day-to-Day this afternoon, and they talked to the Marketplace tech-reporter about Chrome. Their conversation was amazingly ill-informed.....
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94194981
some selected quotes, since i'm not going to transcribe the whole damn thing "Chrome does have some new features, but these are things the average user isn't exactly clamoring for. ... Internet browsers are a dime-a-dozen .... The only people really excited about this are techies [ok, i'll give her that one]"
when asked what the techies are excited about: "there is a new tabbing feature and that let's you tab between internet pages so you can start a new page without opening up a new browser session, so that's exciting. And Google says its browser is powerful enough for complex applications, such as 3D video. But these are not things the average user is asking for. I'm not, anyway, Alex, and i'm thinking you're not either"
fortunately, the host pointed out that he already has tabbing on his FireFox
then she talked for almost a minute about "this new 3D video" that Google is pushing, which sounded a lot like Flash applications. Then she said that we could check back "in 3 years" to see if people are adopting the browser 9/2/2008 6:11:22 PM |
gs7 All American 2354 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "...is ff3 worth downloading?" |
You don't already have it? Yes, yes it is, get it now.9/2/2008 6:20:05 PM |
Azaka ///Meh 4833 Posts user info edit post |
mouse gestures is the best thing ever, wtf are you talking about 9/2/2008 6:35:39 PM |
kiljadn All American 44690 Posts user info edit post |
I prefer Chrome to every single browser I've ever used. 9/2/2008 6:42:51 PM |
Quinn All American 16417 Posts user info edit post |
B-
Crappy theme 9/2/2008 6:52:59 PM |
Prospero All American 11662 Posts user info edit post |
i'm dying here with all these ads.... this is unbearable.
possibly the best browser i've ever used except for all the ads... someone please... make it stop!!!! 9/2/2008 6:57:25 PM |
dannydigtl All American 18302 Posts user info edit post |
I'm not seeing how its that much faster. to me it just shows a blank page for a second and then renders it all at once pretty quickly. firefox just started instantly and rendered.. id guess about the same amount of total time..
I also have the same things open in each browser and mem usage is about the same.
It'll take me a bit to get used to these ugly tabs as well. 9/2/2008 6:59:23 PM |